An architectural model to yield members, Rosters, and Venues sovereignty over their own domains, and none over each other’s.
”Who belongs” and “What belonging means” are different questions. What happens if one steward stops answering both?
We guarantee that users aren’t subject to platforms. Yet communities are still subject to their stewards. Can we fix this?
A compendium to my upcoming proposal for community infrastructure within the AT Protocol
Quick spitball idea on how to create soft-gated safe spaces for communities non-cryptographically